|
Informal Learning: Rediscovering the Natural Pathways That Inspire Innovation and Performance
Jay Cross
Amazon's book description:
Most learning on the job is informal. This book
offers advice on how to support, nurture, and
leverage informal learning and helps trainers
to go
beyond their typical classes and programs in
order
to widen and deepen heir reach. The author
reminds
us that we live in a new, radically different,
constantly changing, and often distracting
workplace. He guides us through the plethora of
digital learning tools that workers are now
accessing through their computers, PDAs, and cell
phones.
Purchase from Amazon.com
|
|
| |
Performance Optimization through Quality
Analytics for Knowledge Workers
Optimizing performance requires different
strategies to address specific business
challenges and drivers. You know the story:
Workers interact with five to twelve computer
systems per day to get the job done, most of
which are the behemoth enterprise systems.
The systems change frequently. Employee
turnover is 25% or more. Business processes
are misaligned with the features and
functions of the various systems. In all
such cases, a conventional learning/training
paradigm will not yield a level of
performance necessary to claim organizational
competency. Things simply change too quickly
and there is too much to master. And let's
face it: Time-to-competency is the key
metric that informs the business case.
Organizations keenly aware of the so-called
"learning-doing" gap can address these
problems in a manner similar to how the
manufacturing world addressed similar woes in
past decades. Thought leaders such as W.
Edwards Deming invented quality principles
and methods that are applicable to knowledge
work if the right measurements and analytics
are applied. What are these measurements?
They are the check sheets, Pareto charts and
histograms that represent which computer
controls knowledge workers touch in their
enterprise applications, how long it takes
them to accomplish units and cycles of work,
where processes are broken and when
workarounds are applied. Such "stealth
capture" of knowledge worker actions provides
a wealth of knowledge about how to make the
transition from learning to performance. It
tells us how the human factors apply in terms
of distributing knowledge artifacts
appropriately so that workers are able to
consume, apply and perform as close to the
time of need as possible.
From such
analysis emerges a clear picture of which are
true prerequisite tasks, which require
"training" and which are best supported
through embedded just-in-time support. And
the task distributions can be startling when
it becomes clear that only a very small
number of tasks and concepts require learning
in advance, where eLearning or classroom
training can be safely limited to a day or
less and where the vast majority of what is
required on the job is delivered at the time
of need. A recent case study demonstrated
how such measurement and analysis reduced
four weeks of classroom training to a blend
of 4 hours of eLearning, one day of training
and mostly embedded support.
Time-to-competency was reduced to one week
from over four weeks. What did this mean to
the organization? A $4 million return - on a
$160,000 investment. Remarkable. In this
sense, performance-centered solutions are
linked to key strategic business drivers. As
such, performance support is an imperative --
not an option -- for ensuring business
performance through human performance.
Regards,
Gary J.
Dickelman
|
| |
| |
| |
| 2007 PCD Awards |
| |
It's that time again! EPSScentral LLC is now
accepting submissions for the 2007
Performance Centered Design Awards! Here's
your chance to gain recognition for yourself,
your organization, your solution or tool, and
your business sponsor.
|
| |
Read more from epsscentral.info ... |
| |
| 3rd Annual Innovations in E-Learning Symposium |
| |
Gary Dickelman and Sonia Arias will be
presenting at 3rd Annual Innovations in
E-Learning Symposium, June 5 - 7, 2007 at
George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. Topic:
Fast and Effective Contextual Analysis for
ICTs in Education: Performance-Centered
Design Fills the Gap.
|
| |
Read more from innovationsinelearning.gmu.edu ... |
| |
| Fast, Cheap, and Good Usability Methods |
| |
The sooner you complete a usability study, the
higher its impact on
the design process. Slower methods should be
deferred to an annual
usability checkup.
|
| |
Read more from useit.com ... |
| |
| Enterprise Information Architecture: A Semantic and Organizational Foundation |
| |
People disagree on what happens when IAs grow up,
but Tom Reamy knows.
He offers a foundation for information
architecture
as it advances,
grappling with problems across the enterprise.
|
| |
Read more from boxesandarrows.com ... |
| |
| Designing Web Applications for Use |
| |
Larry Constantine, IDSA, of Constantine &
Lockwood,
describes several
of the recurring problems with user-centered
design
and discusses how
designing for use rather than for users is a
way to
focus design more
sharply.
|
| |
Read more from uie.com ... |
| |
| Riding the Waves of "Web 2.0" |
| |
"Web 2.0" has become a catch-all buzzword that
people use to describe
a wide range of online activities and
applications,
some of which the
Pew Internet & American Life Project has been
tracking for years.
|
| |
Read more from pewinternet.org ... |
| |
| Technology Foundations for Computational Evaluation of Software Security Attributes |
| |
Abstract: In the current state of practice,
analysis
of the security
attributes of software systems is typically
carried
out through
subjective evaluations by security experts who
accumulate system
knowledge in bits and pieces from architectures,
specifications,
designs, code, and tests. In contrast, this
report
describes
foundations for a new computational security
attributes (CSA)
technology. This innovative approach provides
precise computational
methods for defining and analyzing security
attributes based solely on
the data and transformations of data found within
programs. CSA
permits security attributes to be evaluated
through
automatable
analysis of the functional behavior of
programs. The
technology can
support specification of security attributes of
systems before they
are built; specification and evaluation of
security
attributes of
acquired software; verification of the as-built
security attributes of
systems; and real-time evaluation of security
attributes during system operation.
|
| |
Read more from sei.cmu.edu ... |
| |
|